add to wish list | library


9 of 10 recommend this,
would you recommend it?

yes | no

Support this site by purchasing from these vendors using the paid links below. As an Amazon Associate SA-CD.net earns from qualifying purchases.
 
amazon.ca
amazon.co.uk
amazon.com
amazon.de
 
amazon.fr
amazon.it
 
 
 
Label:
  Verve - http://www.vervemusicgroup.com/
Serial:
  B0001127-06
Title:
  Sarah Vaughan: Sarah Vaughan
Description:
  "Sarah Vaughan"

Sarah Vaughan
Track listing:
  1. Lullaby of Birdland
2. April in Paris
3. He's My Guy
4. Jim
5. You're Not The Kind
6. Embraceable You
7. I'm Glad There Is You
8. September Song
9. It's Crazy
10. Lullaby Of Birdland
Genre:
  Jazz - Vocal
Content:
  Mono
Media:
  Single Layer
Recording type:
  Analogue
Recording info:
 

delete from library | delete recommendation | report errors
 
Related titles: 2


 
Reviews: 4 show all

Review by DVDBeaver August 11, 2008 (2 of 2 found this review helpful)
Performance:   
Mono, but still track 2 is enough to bring many people to tears.
I've owned a lot of Sassy on CD but this SACD blows away previous.
Now, there is some hiss but the flat sound suits the 1954 Jazz 'feel' IMO.
I really love the limited sonics on this as being unmanipulated and clean. That's just me.
Am imperfect SACD but one of the favorites, and most played, that I own.

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by JW October 9, 2004 (1 of 1 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:
sbg is spot on with his description of this SA-CD. The sound is somewhat thin and it just sounds like a 1954 mono recording, old. But I would not discourage anyone from buying this due to our two star ratings. Though not of audiophile standard I still find it pleasant to listen to. Despite the hardening treble the sound has a clarity to it and an atmospheric quality that I find appealing. I do not have this disc on vinyl, but when I listen to my Columbia LP of 'In Hi-Fi' the sound is warmer and her voice has more trimbre. This LP version is no sonic gem either. The Pablo box set sounds more like it but that was recorded between 1978-1982.

JW

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no

Review by andyshedd February 16, 2006 (1 of 12 found this review helpful)
Performance:   
Why anyone would buy a mono SACD is beyond me. Isn't that what audio tapes are for?

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no