|
|
|
|
de Prévert :
Oh ! je voudrais tant que tu te souviennes
Des jours heureux où nous étions amis.
En ce temps-là la vie était plus belle,
Et le soleil plus brûlant qu'aujourd'hui.
Les feuilles mortes se ramassent à la pelle.
Tu vois, je n'ai pas oublié...
Les feuilles mortes se ramassent à la pelle,
Les souvenirs et les regrets aussi
Et le vent du nord les emporte
Dans la nuit froide de l'oubli.
Tu vois, je n'ai pas oublié
La chanson que tu me chantais.
C'est une chanson qui nous ressemble.
Toi, tu m'aimais et je t'aimais
Et nous vivions tous deux ensemble,
Toi qui m'aimais, moi qui t'aimais.
Mais la vie sépare ceux qui s'aiment,
Tout doucement, sans faire de bruit
Et la mer efface sur le sable
Les pas des amants désunis.
Les feuilles mortes se ramassent à la pelle,
Les souvenirs et les regrets aussi
Mais mon amour silencieux et fidèle
Sourit toujours et remercie la vie.
Je t'aimais tant, tu étais si jolie.
Comment veux-tu que je t'oublie ?
En ce temps-là, la vie était plus belle
Et le soleil plus brûlant qu'aujourd'hui.
Tu étais ma plus douce amie
Mais je n'ai que faire des regrets
Et la chanson que tu chantais,
Toujours, toujours je l'entendrai !
C'est une chanson qui nous ressemble...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deribas said:
Just wondering, are there any avid cyclists among the SA-CD.net crowd?
Love cycling. My bicycle is a red P-15 Schwinn Paramount. Love that bike.
|
|
|
Post by hiredfox November 2, 2013 (403 of 1066)
|
|
samayoeruorandajin said:
That's right, I vote, and I vote proudly for a non-church centered, i.e., a freedom of religious expression society. However, I also see those evolutionists doing things in the future to suppress religious freedom. I see it coming from people right here on this forum. I sense it at every turn for those who think they have the corner on intellectual debate to completely throw out science from a creationist point of view.
It doesn't pay to be out of the loop for even a day or two on here, log back in and the debate has left you far behind and long moved on. A secular society is not anti-religious as you suggest.
We seem to be going in the right direction over here where extreme evolutionists (there are one or two usually with an Oxford background) are regarded with the same affection as all eccentrics, listened to politely then ignored just like the rest of us.
|
|
|
Post by hiredfox November 2, 2013 (404 of 1066)
|
|
Deribas said:
Just wondering, are there any avid cyclists among the SA-CD.net crowd?
Had you 'trick cyclists' in mind with your tease? Need you ask there are evidently quite a few.
|
|
|
|
|
|
samayoeruorandajin said:
I sense it at every turn for those who think they have the corner on intellectual debate to completely throw out science from a creationist point of view.
Creationism is not science. As the Vatican Priest put it, "It's kind of a plague. It presents itself as science and it's not."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uaz9Ks338c4
Furthermore, there is no such thing as science from a Creationist point of view, or Hindu point of view, or science from a Muslim point of view. The laws of nature don't change to fit anybody's religious beliefs - they are universal, they simply describe the world as is.
|
|
|
Post by Lute November 2, 2013 (406 of 1066)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post by Deribas November 2, 2013 (407 of 1066)
|
|
hiredfox said:
Had you 'trick cyclists' in mind with your tease? Need you ask there are evidently quite a few.
Nah, my British English is not idiomatic enough for that. I just meant the conventional two-wheel kind. Seems like the two activities balance each other nicely: one for movement and taking in the surrounding world passing by, the other for stillness and shutting out the outside world in favor of music.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hiredfox said:
It doesn't pay to be out of the loop for even a day or two on here, log back in and the debate has left you far behind and long moved on. A secular society is not anti-religious as you suggest.
We seem to be going in the right direction over here where extreme evolutionists (there are one or two usually with an Oxford background) are regarded with the same affection as all eccentrics, listened to politely then ignored just like the rest of us.
I would assert that Windsurfer fits the description I have made of an anti-Christian viewpoint and he's clearly from the US. IMO, there's extremists on both sides that will hurt us all and those are the people who want a theocracy on one side and those who want to limit the voting rights (such as Windsurfer) on the other because they think those who believe in a creationist point of view ignorant or worse yet mentally ill.
|
|
|
Post by sgb November 2, 2013 (409 of 1066)
|
|
hiredfox said:
It doesn't pay to be out of the loop for even a day or two on here, log back in and the debate has left you far behind and long moved on. A secular society is not anti-religious as you suggest.
We seem to be going in the right direction over here where extreme evolutionists (there are one or two usually with an Oxford background) are regarded with the same affection as all eccentrics, listened to politely then ignored just like the rest of us.
I've just seen this portion of the thread and must admit that I have nothing but scorn for these effete elitists who want to deprive the traditional segments of society of their cherished heritages. Thank you for expressing your views, sir. I wasn't aware that windsurfer was that arrogant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sgb said:
I've just seen this portion of the thread and must admit that I have nothing but scorn for these effete elitists who want to deprive the traditional segments of society of their cherished heritages.
The walls we built of myths and superstition are crumbling. Oh help us Lord!
|
|
