|
|
|
|
January 16, 2005
|
The material in this album is typical for this kind of multi-performer collections that have many times been done for marketing reasons only. I personally don't like this approch because the performers seldom are at their best on these records. The same happended with many late recordings of John ... more |
|
|
|
|
|
October 18, 2004
|
This is the DVD sound track on SACD. The sound is maybe somewhat better than the DD5.1 but it is not up to modern standards. Allman Brother's Fillmore from 1971 is actually much better. Buy the DVD instead because then you'll get the video and actually the audio on the DVD is pretty OK for a music ... more |
|
|
|
|
|
October 18, 2004
|
The sound on this record is amazing if you take into account the recording date. And the music is ... what it is. I just love it. This is much better than the DTS version. Listen to Gregs voice ... everything sounds as if you would be sitting some 50m from the stage. I can recommend this record to ... more |
|
|
|
|
|
October 18, 2004
|
This is maybe my favourite Dylan record. The music is superb. The sound is no high fidelity at all. Multi-channel sounds somewhat better, though. But I don't see any reason to re-release Dylan's records in SACD. There is no sonic improvement compared to the earlier CD's at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
October 18, 2004
|
This record is very good. It can be considered as equal to his mid 60'es master pieces. He never could do anything better after this one .... The sonics are not good, however. The sound on the SACD is the same as on the CD i.e. there is no improvement at all and the LP sound was bad, too. He never ... more |
|
