Post by Beagle November 11, 2012 (1 of 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post by hiredfox November 12, 2012 (2 of 6)
|
|
Beats me. She was born in 1945 so not old enough to have recorded in the 50's. I remember from my younger days that EMI and other labels issued mono & stereo versions of recordings in the 60's but not sure when the practice ended.
I'd hazard a guess in this case that the stereo tapes were not good enough for e-mastering so SG & friends elected to go with the mono tape? Pure speculation of course, with no supportive evidence.
|
|
|
Post by Claude November 12, 2012 (3 of 6)
|
|
Who said anything about mono?
|
|
|
Post by Beagle November 12, 2012 (4 of 6)
|
|
Claude said: Who said anything about mono?
JPC: Detailinformationen . . . Tonformat: mono (Hybrid)
--But it appears to be a mistake from lazy sight-reading of "Georg Monn". I finally found the LP listed as "stereo": http://www.musicstack.com/item/13557202.
|
|
|
Post by hiredfox November 13, 2012 (5 of 6)
|
|
Beagle said:
JPC: Detailinformationen . . . Tonformat: mono (Hybrid)
--But it appears to be a mistake from lazy sight-reading of "Georg Monn". I finally found the LP listed as "stereo": http://www.musicstack.com/item/13557202.
Might be better to keep an open mind until confirmed from an independent source. My earlier comment may still apply.
Maybe if Simon Gibson is watching he could clarify.. please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
i received my copy of this SACD this morning and it is not mono it is in Stereo.
best regards
|
|
