Post by wehecht August 24, 2010 (1651 of 4131)
|
|
seth said:
Go for it. That seems like a very reasonable way to reduce costs.
But please don't get into digipaks. They look cool, but get damaged over time and there is no way to replace them.
I agree wholeheartedly. Cutting the costs and possibly issuing more sacd's is a no brainer but please stick with the standard jewel cases. Digipaks are way too fragile!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, Robert. Go for the change. Cosmetic changes are a minor thing; the real change is the disc itself.
|
|
|
Post by krisjan August 24, 2010 (1653 of 4131)
|
|
bissie said:
Hence my question: what would the members of this Forum say, if we were to change to standard RBCD Jewel Boxes, only marking the SACD status through a different colour on the spine, possibly a transparent tray with the caption SACD under, the sticker, and a different lay-out of the Inlay-card?
Whaddayathink?
Go for it!! If it means continued SACD releases AND more money in your pocket, just do it!
|
|
|
Post by tream August 24, 2010 (1654 of 4131)
|
|
I would be OK with even digipaks, if that meant more SACD's. I vote for the change.
|
|
|
Post by Claude August 24, 2010 (1655 of 4131)
|
|
Regular jewel cases are actually my preferred packaging, because they are so easily replacable. Since the introduction of the super jewel cases, there have been two different versions, with incompatible inlay formats.
|
|
|
Post by seth August 24, 2010 (1656 of 4131)
|
|
Robert:
By the way, I've been enjoying your new Tamberg CD quite a bit.
|
|
|
Post by pgmdir August 24, 2010 (1657 of 4131)
|
|
Claude said:
Regular jewel cases are actually my preferred packaging, because they are so easily replacable. Since the introduction of the super jewel cases, there have been two different versions, with incompatible inlay formats.
Please Robert!!!! Not only OK with most of us, but desired! Easily replaced jewel boxes mean a nice looking collection. The one really good thing about the Super box is being able to piggy back two discs simply.
|
|
|
Post by Ubertrout August 24, 2010 (1658 of 4131)
|
|
I like the Super Jewel Cases, but if it means more SACD releases, by all means go to standard cases. As for marking them, as long as there's a SACD logo on the back, that's all I need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go for it if this can reduce cost and brings more SACD to the market.
|
|
|
Post by steviev August 24, 2010 (1660 of 4131)
|
|
The type of jewel box used is almost entirely irrelevant. Go with whatever is cheapest.
|
|
