add to wish list | library


14 of 17 recommend this,
would you recommend it?

yes | no

Support this site by purchasing from these vendors using the paid links below. As an Amazon Associate SA-CD.net earns from qualifying purchases.
 
amazon.ca
amazon.co.uk
amazon.com
amazon.de
 
amazon.fr
amazon.it
 
 

Reviews: Frederick Fennell conducts the music of Leroy Anderson

read discussion

Reviews: 1

Review by Ivymike February 28, 2006 (5 of 8 found this review helpful)
Performance:   Sonics:  
Frankly, none of the performances of these pops pieces will replace those on other sources I own by Fiedler and the Boston Pops on RCA or Abravanel on Vanguard, which is a bit surprising given Fennell's famous pops touch.

Why? They just don't pack much sparkle or oomph when compared to others mentioned above. Oh, they are fine and make good background music but to my taste they just aren't quite there, not risky enough. The London sessions sound more fun; perhaps the London air did something for Fennell or maybe the orchestra just wanted to have a good time. I don't know.

The sound is similarly mixed. The first fourteen tracks were recorded in the Eastman Theater in two sessions, one in March, 1958 and the other in October, 1956; the Watford Town Hall sessions were taped in 1964. The usual Mercury three microphone set up with half-inch, three-track Ampex tape recorders was used for all sessions. The 1958 sessions sound...well, okay but a bit dead with regards to hall sound. Image depth isn't that great, either and the whole thing sounds professional but a bit flat and not up the to usual high Mercury standard. The 1956 sessions, which used different mics, are a bit more reverberant and the sense of hall is better with more depth. The 1964 sessions sound more like a typical, high-quality Mercury: lots of dynamic range, plenty of great hall ambience. I don't know if the different mics used had anything to do with it or if we are hearing the effects of remastering tweaking (the level of tape hiss on this disc is markedly lower than on the other Mercury SACD's I own; a little equalization in the upper midrange/treble perhaps?) or if we are hearing some age-related treble self-erasure in the tapes or if that's simply the way Bob Fine wanted the tapes to sound.

The center channel shows its presence in the usual improved soundstage width, something I'm at a loss to explain, and woodwinds have good presence. Overall it really isn't a huge improvement over the earlier, red book CD.

A mixed bag, then. If you have the red book CD I'd not recommend this disc.

And why are tracks 15-23 listed as "Orchestra conducted by Frederick Fennell"? Is it the London Symphony Orchestra? The Eastman-Rochester Pops orchestra? A pick-up ensemble?

Was this review helpful to you?  yes | no