|
|||||||||
|
User Details - acousticsguru
Name: |
David | |
Details: |
||
Location: |
||
HiFi: |
||
Email: |
||
Web: |
||
Posts: |
10 |
Reviews |
Found: 5 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
November 16, 2015
|
|
This is really making me scratch my head: I don't have a problem with matters of personal taste, or anyone finding the new APO expensive given the short playing time, or deploring the fact that the Concerto in F is missing etc. - but to say the two remasterings sound the same says more about the reviewer (and/or his equipment) than the two releases ... more | |
October 2, 2015
|
|
I have both the stereo and mono 24/192 PCM 2013 Remaster, as well as the so-called "best" of the the earlier SACD releases, the single-layer CS 64935, and now this, the MFSL SACD. I can see why some prefer the monaural PCM (although perhaps for sentimental reasons, as it most corresponds to the original release), but I grew up hearing this album in ... more | |
May 11, 2015
|
|
"There are two classic recordings of the complete Daphnis et Chloé which will never be superseded: Pierre Monteux with the LSO on Decca and Charles Munch with the Boston SO on RCA" Those are indeed legendary recordings, and regardless of what "supersede" means in the context of musical interpretation, life would be poorer without them (= that is ... more | |
May 5, 2015
|
|
Anyone compared the APO SACD to the Classic Records DAD? Greetings from Switzerland, David. ... more | |
April 5, 2015
|
|
Sound quality is simply wonderful! Wow! Greetings from Switzerland, David. ... more |
|