 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||
|
User Details - mercutio
Name: |
mercutio | |
Details: |
||
Location: |
minnesota | |
HiFi: |
||
Email: |
||
Web: |
||
Posts: |
7 |
Reviews |
Found: 0 |
January 26, 2012
|
|
| The "Cheop's Tomb" sound field is great for Memphis blues! Wouldn't be without it. ... more | |
January 26, 2012
|
|
| "HDMI is better for you." I agree. And economical. Why have an expensive player when all one needs from a player is an HDMI signal? On the other hand, having the pre-ins on the AV receiver allows one to revert at any time to the time-wasting and expensive habit of switching in multi-channel players. ... more | |
January 25, 2012
|
|
| "What happened to analog MC inputs on receivers? I can't find one with analog inputs. I don't want to use HDMI!!!" Just bought a Yamaha 667 for $319. It has pre-ins and pre-outs and good amplification. ... more | |
January 24, 2012
|
|
| That's the fun of having an AV processor that allows you to experiment with the playback! Stevie may have used a different recording scheme for that song, and as a result it might sound good processed in a particular way. Having a good sacd player is a good thing, but if you have only that, you're stuck with the cd/stereo-sacd/multi-track sacd ... more | |
January 24, 2012
|
|
| Fitzcarlo wrote: "The result is much lower cost and much easier placement." So true about the cost/benefit. I've been tinkering with used items for quite a while, looking for good sound and value. But I'm now sold on multichannel processors. Ultra low cost: Pioneer dvd 610: $103, passes dsd via hdmi. Yamaha 667: $319, processes dsd, etc., via ... more | |
|
||||
|
