|
|||||||||
|
User Details - ruxtonvet
Name: |
Michael Kaplan | |
Details: |
||
Location: |
||
HiFi: |
||
Email: |
||
Web: |
||
Posts: |
10 |
Reviews |
Found: 19 show all |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
November 8, 2014
|
|
I am a only a consumer of SACDs not a manufacturer or distributer. Why should I need to submit this SACD? Are you saying that the only way you will review a new release if for someone sends you a free copy to review? I assume most manufacturers would find it in their best interest to do that, but this I suspect is a small company that may not be ... more | |
November 5, 2014
|
|
Why is this release not covered on SACD.net? ... more | |
November 26, 2013
|
|
I listen in stereo. This is not a great 2 channel recording as pertains to sound quality. There is a bright edge to the treble in some sections of the disc and the sound stage is smeared. Still the overall sound quality is very good just not outstanding. Excellent performance in my opinion. ... more | |
October 2, 2013
|
|
The insert mentions that the "extra clarity" of the recording is due to the 48 microphones that are used in the recording process. Enough said. ... more | |
October 1, 2013
|
|
There is a decided digital edge to this SACD. It is so bad that I would not buy this SACD. This is a 1995 digital recording. No reason to make a SACD out of it - just an unlistenable CD would have been fine. Sonically I would give this 2 stars. ... more |
|