add to wish list | library


33 of 37 recommend this,
would you recommend it?

yes | no

Support this site by purchasing from these vendors using the paid links below. As an Amazon Associate SA-CD.net earns from qualifying purchases.
 
amazon.ca
amazon.co.uk
amazon.com
amazon.de
 
amazon.fr
amazon.it
CDJapan
jpc

Discussion: Yes: Fragile

Posts: 35
Page: prev 1 2 3 4

Post by hooperthom February 21, 2012 (31 of 35)
I have an Oppo 95 using analog out and YES FRAGILE sounds great. 5.1 arrangement is a little odd sometimes. Never heard DVD-A version except Hi-rez download. SCAD have very deep bass compared to the download.

Post by hooperthom February 21, 2012 (32 of 35)
hooperthom said:

I have an Oppo 95 using analog out and YES FRAGILE sounds great. 5.1 arrangement is a little odd sometimes. Never heard DVD-A version except Hi-rez download. SCAD have very deep bass compared to the download.

If you come across Yes Magnification on DVD-A pick it up. Very nice sound for a DVD-A.

Post by progboy July 16, 2013 (33 of 35)
Who mixed this version? The 2002 DVD-A was produced, engineered and mixed by Tim Weidner

Post by Markdot February 13, 2015 (34 of 35)
I also prefer the Oppo Players for my listening of DVD-A and SACD media, (actually - for ALL disc media of any type!)

I have both the BDP-83 and a BDP-103 included in my home system - if it matters.

However, as much as I love this masterpiece of "Yes works", I was very disappointed in the DVD-A rendition, which I bought years ago.

Thankfully, both of those lossless formats (DVD-A and SACD) produce (arguably) equal audio fidelity, including dynamic range, resolution, and frequency response- fantastic excellence for even the most meticulous human ear to experience. So my only complaint is with "the mix".

The DVD-A mix simply "got it wrong" compared to that of the original vinyl release, (and I suppose even the 16 bit redbook CD) in its staging AND phasing.

I was appalled to the point of sadness! Instruments that were made dominant in the forefront channels of the original mix were burried or out of phase in the 5.1 DVD-A mix. Without going into a track-by-track complaint, let it suffice to say that even though I listened to this masterpiece since it came out without tiring of it, I cannot listen to the DVD-A rendition due to this anomaly.

I therefore hope that the SACD version/mix is correct - or rather as the original mix sounded with respect to the staging (which was perfect).

But it seems I am alone in this opinion - or else just alone in voicing it this way. The works are certainly worth re-buying if need-be, but one shouldn't have to!

Post by sylvian February 14, 2015 (35 of 35)
Sorry, this particular release contains the same content as DVD-A sauf lossy formats. The only difference is DSD coding so the result of INTERPRETAION of the 6 channnels from SACD (2011) might be different from PCM coding of the 6 channels from 2003 release. Stereo tracks are the same as far I can know bit per bit.

I know that Rhino masters are not done very well, but they are far better than any pre-millenium release. For example when I extracted the stereo streams from DVD-A I have had to relocate the track markings to the extent, that I am only now content with proper boundaries tween the tracks. The mark tween Long Distance Runaroud & the fish has been lifted (cause there is no reason for it). And the mark of We Have Heaven and South Side of the Sky needed to be relocated to the appropriate place and also the reprise of We Have Heaven I have to edit out of The Heart of the Sunrise (I hate codas being done this way).

I wonder why the authoring of the DVD-A had been done in a very poor way for this marvel. Shit happens!

Page: prev 1 2 3 4

Closed