|
|
|
I sorry we are unable to made a new SACD fan with friendship. As there is no Official Rules to follow in this site, Petrus is free to dispute.
Iam a very small ant in this site, down here I see a complete lack of the:
> Rule Nº1: RedBook CD is Low Resolution because it is 44Khz sampling rate, debates are NO accept.
> Rule Nº2: SACD is Hi Resolution because it is 64 X 44Khz (sampling rate=2.8Mhz), debates are NO accept.
A few years ago I had a neighbor audiophile who used my computer to post messages in SACD.NET, share the same computer is barely a shame.
Now I ashamed of my poor english, thanks(guys) for reply my messages all this years.
|
|
|
Post by Karlosak December 5, 2009 (12 of 33)
|
|
The fact that Petrus and zinkear both have the same IP address doesn't automatically mean they are the same person. Though *HIGHLY* unlikely, they could be different personas under the same internet service provider or company network. Just playing a bit of devil's advocate here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
zeus said:
I respect your request and IP addresses will no longer be publically visible. If you logout you can confirm the change.
Thank you Stephen. I would, however, make that cause for booting those who come with multiple personalities off the forum. As for IP addresses, you know them and that's enough.
|
|
|
Post by Karlosak December 5, 2009 (14 of 33)
|
|
Arnaldo said:
On the other hand, Petrus/zinkear's IP address is 91.152.163.179, and is his (or is it theirs?) alone. The last 6 digits are unique. There's no way around it at all.
This is not exactly true. The IP address is unique for communication between your router and ISP. If you have home/company LAN established, then several people can share the same public IP address (through NAT).
As I said, highly unlikely, but possible, yes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arnaldo said:
What are the chance of having two unconnected guys, using the same NAT router, out of the same town in Finland, posting the same kind of stuff, on the same website? Zilch. Nada. Zero. It's one lone wacko. I know it, you know it, Zeus knows it, and the Petrus and zinkear twins know it too. On the other hand, if one believes in UFOs...
The CD equivalent to the Global Warming propaganda lie.
Pathetic that a "scientist" has stooped so low.
Artist: Petri Kaipiainen[?]
Song: One-minute vacation for September 10, 2007
http://beemp3.com/download.php?file=4559569&song=One-minute+vacation+for+September+10%2C+2007
"This mp3 file was found at:" http://www.quietamerican.org/index.html
"These one-minute vacations are real-time, unedited, 1-minute recordings that capture moments in places all over the world. They're one of the many sound projects put together by Aaron Ximm, displayed on his Quiet American web site. The bulk of the site is devoted to Ximm's field recordings, which you can listen to/download from the site in MP3 and Real Audio format."
http://www.erasingclouds.com/04janu.html
Aaron Ximm (b. 1970) is a San-Francisco-based field recordist and sound artist.
http://www.23five.org/archives/aaronximm.html
Twitter http://twitter.com/quiet
interview http://www.tokafi.com/15questions/15questionsaaronximm/
From www.move.com.au web site mentioning Aaron Ximm
http://www.move.com.au/artist.cfm/845
is a link about
"Petri Kuljuntausta is a composer, performer and sound artist. His latest soundscape compositions are based on the first recorded sounds of Aurora Borealis along with soundscape compositions based on urban environments like the cities of London, Milan and Helsinki. Kuljuntausta has collaborated with the experimental film director Sami van Ingen, urban architecture group Ocean-North, Morton Subotnick, Atau Tanaka, sound artist Richard Lerman and musician/philosopher David Rothenberg, and he has made recordings for various labels in England, Finland, France, Germany and the USA."
http://www.move.com.au/disc.cfm/3275
|
|
|
Post by zeus December 5, 2009 (16 of 33)
|
|
Time to move on folks.
|
|
|
Post by rammiepie December 5, 2009 (17 of 33)
|
|
zeus said:
It has been put to me that some may have privacy concerns so I've restored the previous state.
I understand that some may have created duplicate logins due to a forgotten password (which can be easily retrieved by requesting login details to be resent) or other legitimate reasons. However doing so as a sockpuppet (look it up) is not acceptable and I will take the appropriate action to maintain the integrity of this site.
According to the UNcyclopediA, sockpuppets "have hands up their butts, but this does not mean they should be victims of discrimination." So this should be fair warning from the MAN down under who patrols this site with a dingo at his side and a 45 in his hip pocket that further trolling on this site will not be tolerated. Outta-SITE, Outta-MIND!
|
|
|
Post by Ear December 9, 2009 (18 of 33)
|
|
Yes, that was what I thought. I replied anyway. But certainly won't do it again. I honestly wonder if those people don't have anything to do in real life. How sad is it if your source of fun is, to come to a forum and rattle cages. And if they mean what they write...well I won't try to change their minds. We all here should ignore people who do not have any interest in SACD and high res. This is what I did and will do again. But you know, the nick 'AudioMaster' combined with that ridiculous post was just too tempting. LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FullRangeMan said:
> Rule Nº1: RedBook CD is Low Resolution because it is 44Khz sampling rate, debates are NO accept.
> Rule Nº2: SACD is Hi Resolution because it is 64 X 44Khz (sampling rate=2.8Mhz), debates are NO accept.
You fail the audio resolution test quiz.
If we compare PCM and sigma-delta coding, the sampling rate is not a desicive factor.
In PCM the value difference between samples can be 2 to the power of bits. In 16 bit sampling that is something like 65000 units. In DSD the sample value is one bit. If the sampling rate is 64 times higher, DSD can put out all of 64 values in the same timeframe. This makes it very difficult to sample loud high frequency signals with DSD. The waveform moves too fast for a sigma-delta ADC counting just one bit at the time to follow.
This really can not be explaned any simpler. If even this is above the intelligence level of some, too bad.
|
|
|
Post by zeus December 9, 2009 (20 of 33)
|
|
AudioMaster said:
You fail the audio resolution test quiz.
Bye.
|
|
