Post by maac59 March 23, 2009 (21 of 65)
|
|
Classical separate, the rest integrated. My girlfriend says I'm snob and fastidious; I don't like it when people mix compliments with barbs... :-(
|
|
|
Post by Domimag March 23, 2009 (22 of 65)
|
|
oh no !
In French we say "On ne mélange pas les torchons et les serviettes !" (we do not mix rags and towels !)
Regards
|
|
|
Post by dobyblue March 24, 2009 (23 of 65)
|
|
Separate for me too. I keep my DVD-A's in one area, my SACD's in another. I rarely listen to CD's unless there's no other option, and vinyl is helping in that respect too.
|
|
|
Post by raffells March 24, 2009 (24 of 65)
|
|
Claude said:
I fear the next question will be "Do you file DSD-sourced with PCM-sourced SACDs?" ;-)
Another cracker from you Claude. Or should it be , What you think are DSD sourced recordings against PCM.LoL.
|
|
|
Post by bmax March 25, 2009 (25 of 65)
|
|
Separate.(SACDs &DVD-A). BTW, can we lobby the "site" to give us the SEARCH capability to look for
reviews of "surround" or "5.1" only ? I'd rather not have to page through so much since I mainly limit new
purchases to those.
Max Young
|
|
|
Post by beached April 1, 2009 (26 of 65)
|
|
Separate. Dolby Digital - DTS - DVD-A - SACD MCH - SACD 2CH - 20/24 bit CD - CD. All separate and alphabetically.
|
|
|
Post by pgmdir April 1, 2009 (27 of 65)
|
|
Integrated, by composer.
|
|
|
Post by Beagle April 1, 2009 (28 of 65)
|
|
emaidel said: My son in law stores his chronologically - something he, and only he, can ever understand.
Perhaps I understand: I have CDs and SACDs in separate cabinets, arranged from earliest music through Baroque, Clasical, Romantic and modern eclectic -- with a few jazz recordings at the end. More precisely, I file composers chronologically, e.g. Haydn... Mozart... Beethoven... Schubert.
This schema has worked quite well for me for more than a decade now. Not only do I know where to look for a disc, I also have the option of saying to myself, "Hmmm, am I in a mood for baroque, or is this a good night for twentieth-century?".
|
|
|
Post by stuka May 12, 2009 (29 of 65)
|
|
Together, because we are on a quest to replace all of our favorite CD's with SACD's.
I did this with all my tapes when CD's came out.
|
|
|
Post by jakeroux May 13, 2009 (30 of 65)
|
|
Some of these responses remind me of something I recently saw:
"I'm CDO, it's the same as OCD, just rearranged to be in the proper alphabetical order."
I must admit, I fall into that camp as well, with my SACDs, DVD-As and RBCDs all filed separately (although filed by category/genre within each group, as opposed to alphabetically). I'm really struggling with what to do with my few HDCDs and SHM-CDs though. (and yes, I realize I just lobbed an opportune straight line there for someone...)
|
|