Post by Marpow July 17, 2015 (1 of 29)
|
|
This disc is now released. I have it in my possession, # 1599.
I will do review after a couple spins, but not feeling the sonic quality just yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I note that it is short a few channels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kal Rubinson said:
I note that it is short a few channels.
4 to be exact, Kal!
I have the Warner/Rhino MLP DVD~A 5.1 and it is one of the better sounding hi res discs in my collection and well worth seeking out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kal Rubinson said:
I note that it is short a few channels.
You'll have to add 'em yourself. :-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euell Neverno said:
You'll have to add 'em yourself. :-(
A smug answer, Euell, and hardly a palpable solution!
|
|
|
|
|
|
rammiepie said:
A smug answer, Euell, and hardly a palpable solution!
Not at all. I was led to believe that most common multichannel equipment can synthesize the rear channels from a stereo recording.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euell Neverno said:
Not at all. I was led to believe that most common multichannel equipment can synthesize the rear channels from a stereo recording.
Faux surround, Euell? Really? While some albums synthesize well in what is termed DSP surround, there is nothing like the Real McCoy!
|
|
|
Post by bmoura July 17, 2015 (8 of 29)
|
|
|
rammiepie said:
Faux surround, Euell? Really? While some albums synthesize well in what is termed DSP surround, there is nothing like the Real McCoy!
Much as I enjoy the Surround Master for Stereo to Surround Sound synthesis, I agree. The real thing is always best! :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
rammiepie said:
Faux surround, Euell? Really? While some albums synthesize well in what is termed DSP surround, there is nothing like the Real McCoy!
But, if you don't have a surround track, you either synthesize it or do without those rear channels, not that I miss them, you understand.. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
