Post by Fugue August 24, 2014 (1 of 12)
|
|
Why? Just why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fugue said:
Why? Just why?
Because it's there? And, now waiting for the piano reduction played on fortepiano.
|
|
|
Post by Fugue August 24, 2014 (3 of 12)
|
|
Euell Neverno said:
Because it's there? And, now waiting for the piano reduction played on fortepiano.
I'd prefer it on a clavichord or virginal, but to each his own.
|
|
|
Post by Claude August 25, 2014 (4 of 12)
|
|
Tomita should have done a Mahler cycle.
|
|
|
Post by fausto K August 25, 2014 (5 of 12)
|
|
Claude said:
Tomita should have done a Mahler cycle.
yea, including the 10th, in the Carpenter version!
|
|
|
Post by Claude August 25, 2014 (6 of 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fugue said:
Why? Just why?
Because a chamber arrangement can reveal the melodic content of an orchestral work with startling clarity, e.g. Wanderer - Christoph Prégardien, Ensemble Kontraste.
Ars Produktion's Annette and Manfred Schumacher must have considered the project sufficiently artistically worthy to accept a low return on their investment of time, money and energy.
3Sat, the German TV network, ran a segment on the project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNtwnJpIr-M
Since the chamber arrangement fits onto a single disc, it must be performed, at the very least, "ohne zu schleppen".
|
|
|
Post by fausto K November 6, 2014 (8 of 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impressions developed and moved into a review.
|
|
|
Post by SteelyTom December 3, 2014 (10 of 12)
|
|
Claude said:
Tomita should have done a Mahler cycle.
Or Roland Kirk.
|
|
