|
|
|
|
May 25, 2009
|
The Multichannel version is real multi : the surround speakers are filled with guitars, voices and many other instruments and still the mix is totally balanced. Great Surround mix to me (as they always should be).
Concerning the music, go to iTunes, It'll give you an idea... |
|
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2009
|
Woah... That is harsh surround but still nicely balanced ! I don't know this band (I'm not Dutch, not a little girl either) but it is strong, heavy and I'm very happy I bought it because of your reviews... |
|
|
|
|
|
March 26, 2009
|
Not a bad surround treatment for classical music. People like me would prefer it more agressive (I mean that some instruments may be "attached" to a surround speaker while others may be more federating using them all...
Anyway, here is a nice way to discover the catalogue of this record company ... more |
|
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
Since i didn't find any info in here concerning its multichannel mix, I was a little afraid since my Universal SACD experiences.
We have an incredible surround mix on some tracks (n#4 for instance) and sometimes very spineless ones.
As if the guy at the remix had his little crisis and often a very ... more |
|
|
|
|
|
February 16, 2009
|
Coming from a label like Chesky which reaIeased the greatest demo SACD on earth, I don't understand why it is sold as multichannel. A DSP does better. So if you're really interested in real surround mix you should go on your way...
For those just interested in Chinese music here is the review that ... more |
|
